Bible Reference Index

Diglot Editions

Dunash ben Labrat

Ali Ahmad Said

Verbal System of Ancient Hebrew

The Bible as seen through the eyes of . . .

« Who was Judah the Maccabee? | Main | According to the Bible, could you be fat and still be a priest? »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bob MacDonald

What a memory! I have no idea how I would treat that meme today. Thanks for the silence. So much on being mute in the Psalms and demanding that God not be so - Silent is a frame for psalm 50 and the opening of 83 is insistent. Psalm 109's request is answered by 110.


I too agree with Postrel and with you. My summation of the type of argument Postrel puts forward is "God isn't nice." I think "kindness" was a poor word choice on her part, I think. Being nice, on the other hand seems to have risen to a level of social necessity which makes it neither kind nor, frequently, about the truth.
*stepping away from soapbox now*


Hi Bob,

Your magnificent obsession, the Psalms, is allowing you to see the world prismatically through its textual grid. It's fun to watch.

Hi Robyn,

The social necessity of which you speak needs to be called into question.

Jim ~ Random Arrow

Nice job, John. I read Postrel before coming here. I had mixed feelings about her comments. The facts are ill defined in the Harvard context. Allegations about students treating service worker staff (janitors, food help) with disrespect. Vague.

I’m blessed to work with a few dozen clergy who are kind. And who understand the necessity of ‘case-testing’ in a moot court process to get to the bottom of things in cases they refer to me. While I don’t think that the Socratic method (in which I’m trained) is best for getting at truth, I’d like to add more to Postrel. In law practice, it’s an ethical duty to test a case before going to court. When I worked for one of the largest law firms in the U.S., we had mandatory formal sessions of ganging up on each other to test cases before going to court. It’s an ethical duty – not a pretty please – because clients deserve to know true weaknesses in a case. Test before court. Or your adversary will in court. Simple. And there’s nothing ‘kind’ about it. There is a certain Socratic ruthlessness that’s an ethical duty.

I’m worthless at meta-stuff. Metaphysics. Meta-philosophies. “A time for everything” is as fancy as I get. I think I’d support the Harvard pledge if the pledge focused on knowing what ‘time’ it is. For every kind of conduct.

Another good job, John. Jonah, a surprise. I had in mind the fellow who David said was allowed or appointed by God to criticize David (I think David called off his own bodyguards? – something like this). Divine critics! Divine critics of the faithful. Not just divine critics of ‘others.’ In-house critics. Plus to David, “you’re the man.” Thanks.



Of course Virginia is also, amongst other things, a fan of the benighted atheist "philosopher" Ayn Rand.

Enough said!

KS in MA

Most people can grasp the difference between criticism and attack, or putdown, or one-upmanship, though it's not always easy for undergraduates (not to mention the rest of us) to learn to put that into practice in the heat of the moment. I'm not sure that's what Postrel is talking about--she seems to be making an artificial distinction between "kindness" and "criticism" for the sake of her argument. There are lots of ways to criticize kindly, just as there are lots of ways to criticize unkindly.

Surely God's criticism of humans falls into another category entirely, if for no other reason than that he doesn't have the kind of self-protecting or self-aggrandizing motives that we have. I could go even farther out on a limb and say that whenever we criticize each other well, it's because we're free of those motives too, for a moment.


Hi Jim,

Your actions speak louder than your words. You are well aware I think that the meta-stuff is too important to leave to others.

You are generous with Harvard's kindness rule whereas I am inclined to view it as fundamentally misguided, an index of structural problems of the highest order in higher education.

But like you, my normal point of departure is praxis. For example, my wife lost three mornings this week for jury duty. Each time, the lawyers eventually discarded her and all others with a college degree for jury duty. You don't want someone who is a sometime counselor of victims of sexual abuse on the jury in a case of someone accused of sexual assault. Of course, I also realize that the justice system is broken at so many levels; the example I give is small potatoes in the larger picture.


Your style of argument is know as "guilt-by-association." It is a lazy form of engagment. I would prefer if you wrestled with Postrel's arguments.


Hi KS,

It sounds as if you are seeking to keep the poles critique and kindness in creative tension. I think that is the way forward.

But I disagree that people in general are on the same page. The work of Christian Smith, a sociologist at Notre Dame, notes the disinclination of the majority to engage in moral discourse, to make a distinction between right and wrong. This is one aspect of a larger dysfunctionality. For a summary, go here:

web design Landon

I think "kindness" was a poor word choice on her part, I think. Being nice, on the other hand seems to have risen to a level of social necessity which makes it neither kind nor, frequently, about the truth.

Gary Simmons

Your post is well said, John, and timely. Having only recently moved to Oklahoma, I had the unsavory job of coauthoring an eviction notice for a roommate that was uncooperative, who did not do chores, did not pay rent, and did not even give us a time frame on when he would be able to pay rent. We were lenient with him for three weeks of this month, but even though he has a part-time job, he did not work with us to work something out.

I attempted kindness. Any more kindness to him would be fattening. I refuse to be sweet to the point of harm. Sugar is an excellent analogue, don't you think?

Lamont Goodling


What is your intent when you criticize?



Hi Lamont,

The best general answer I can think of: critique is for the purpose of discovery (accurate self-knowledge and knowledge of others).

How about you? What purpose do you have in mind when you criticize?

Lamont Goodling


I think my intent, when directly criticizing another (not criticism about another) is to act as stimulus for improvement (think criticizing the writing of another), as stimulus for optimization (think criticism of how someone performs a wood-working task, or small engine repair), and as stimulus for discovery (education at its best). When I criticize directly, it is to change someone’s behavior, or to broaden someone’s thinking. When I criticize effectively, the person criticized feels a heightened sense of well-being.

Is this explanation true for you? How do you criticize differently than this? When you criticize, what do hope or expect will happen? What do you hope will not happen? How do you want people to feel when you criticize them?



Hi Lamont,

I agree with a lot of what you say, but not with this:

"When I criticize effectively, the person criticized feels a heightened sense of well-being."

Effective criticism sometimes involves hurting someone's feelings, making them feel uncomfortable; to use a metaphor, rubbing their face in their own vomit.

The example of Jonah from the Bible is congruent with this. An example from the New Testament: Jesus and the rich man (Mark 10:17-25). Note the response of the rich man to Jesus' criticism: "he went away sad."

True criticism is not an act of manipulation; that's exactly what it would be if it produced by definition a heightened sense of well-being or, conversely, an angry or sad response.

Let me know if our point of disagreement is unclear.

Lamont Goodling


Our point of disagreement is quite clear. And I’m glad you brought up Mark 10; it was next on my list of comments.

Taking the story at face value, Jesus’ criticism is accurate (in his worldview), but it is not effective for the rich man, at least not in the open-ended story we are presented with. But this is not a historical accounting of an event, make of it what you will; rather it is a story with an important principle at stake. The real audience is not the rich man in the story, it is the hearer/reader of the story. For some, it will be effective; for others, not so much.

It’s not a story about an individual’s accurate, effective criticism of another person. It’s purpose is broader than that, as I’ve explained above. But when you are criticizing one-on-one with another, if your criticism is ineffective, especially if it is ineffective over hurt feelings, why would you do it?

As a preacher, before an audience, I’m sure you have an interesting criticism experience. In a perfect presentation, you will have gauged your audience, in a shared context, in such a way that your criticism is accurate and effective. When you assess (on the fly) responses from the audience to your criticisms, what do you do when your criticism is not effective? Keep going, or change what you’re doing?

Criticism-through-story is one of the best things I like about Christian scriptures—as long as the criticisms are accurate. The criticisms I find accurate are those about interpersonal and community relationships. Those about relationship with God, not so much.

Your God-Jonah criticism is about the accuracy of ‘when God says jump, the correct response is how high,’ and the effectiveness of God’s methods of criticism. Outside of your faith tradition, the accuracy of this criticism is of no value, and the methods seem, well, manipulative.

If heightening a sense of well being is an act of manipulation for you, how’s your relationship with your wife and kids going? And your vestry?



Hi Lamont,

We disagree more sharply than I thought.

If I understand you correctly, you regard Jesus depicted in the Mark passage as ineffective, and the God of the book of Jonah as a brute.

A more radical smackdown of the authors of the biblical compositions in question is difficult to imagine. Clearly, those who consider Jonah and Mark a light unto their path will not be endowed with a heightened sense of well being by virtue of your critique.

You fail to notice that, when you criticize, often enough you do not create a heightened sense of well being among your conversation partners. To be clear, I am relieved that your praxis is less consistent than your theory.

Criticism does not correlate with a heightened sense of well being. This is not only the case in life and in art but also, I would think, in better theories of psychotherapy. Or am I to imagine that you subscribe to Carl Rogers' mantra: "I'm okay, you're okay"?

Authentic interpersonal interaction, even among the most loyal of friends, will sometimes result in sadness, anger, or feelings of guilt.

For example, I have been married for 25 years; I have a strong and enduring bond with my three children; sadness, anger, guilt and a heightened sense of well being, in variable measure, are all part of the equation.

I am saddened, Lamont, that you are unable to see the universal truths to which the book of Jonah is a witness. In my experience, believers and non-believers, as a general rule, understand without difficulty the force of the divine question, "Are you right to be angry?"

Is the truth to which that question points unknown to you? Somehow I doubt it.

For the rest, I repeat, if criticism is given in a non-manipulative manner, it will sometimes be "effective" and sometimes "ineffective," to return to your terminology.



Let me get this clear before I go much farther. Did my comment of Sep 29/11:26AM hurt your sense of well being?



I think it's fair to say that a comment like yours is ineffective if the metric is an increase in a sense of well being on the part of your conversation partners.

It is possible that *your* sense of well being went up after making disparaging remarks about the Jesus of Mark and the God of the book of Jonah. I don't see how you can expect the sense of well being of a believer to go up in the wake of a comment like yours. Your critical comment stands in contradiction to your theory of criticism.



You didn't answer my question. Was your sense of well being hurt?



Hi Lamont,

I chose to frame my answer in general terms. Clearly you are not satisfied.

My point was the following: you cannot expect the well being of a believer to go up in the wake of a critical comment of the kind you made. Ergo, your theory of criticism is unreasonable.

Perhaps I should be flattered that you care about my personal sense of well being. It's quite high, thank you; but it did not go up in the wake of your critical comment.

It didn't go down either; for that to happen, you would have to come up with cogent arguments in favor of a world view which has no use for the truths that find expression in, for example, the books of Jonah and Mark.

You would have to be more convincing before what psychologists refer to as "cognitive dissonance" set in.

Perhaps you refrain on principle from criticism that produces cognitive dissonance. Perhaps you would consider it ineffective criticism if a critical remark produces cognitive dissonance.

So far, Lamont, you are holding your cards close the vest. Sooner or later you are going to have to reveal them.



I didn't think your sense of well being would go down. Based on the material I've read here, I didn't think my comments would adversely impact your sense of well being. If I had thought that would happen, I would not have posted them. If I have adversely impacted your sense of well being, I appologize. Yes, I do care about your sense of well being.

In her article, Postrel complained that she can't get students to engage in criticism, and she thought it was a quid pro quo reputation issue. But from our discourse, all of our criticisms have been ineffective, nothing has been gained, and we're mildly annoyed with each other's principles and methods of discourse. You can see why the return for students in class is definitely not worth the engagement of arguement and criticism.

I can see that my principles of discourse engagement are not acceptable to you. And yours are not to me.

Again, if I have adversely impacted your sense of well being, I appologize. It's been interesting.




It has been interesting. However, my understanding of what happened in this conversation is different from your understanding.

I am more hopeful.

I am inclined to think that you now realize that the value of criticism cannot be defined in terms of increases / decreases in a sense of well being on the part of those impacted by criticism.

I am also inclined to believe that you have not forgotten that this is a public conversation. Dozens of others, perhaps hundreds, will read it.
You are a strong anti-theist; I don't think you are the least concerned about saying things that might hurt theists. Good for you.

I am glad - you heighten my sense of well being - in the knowledge that you do not refrain from criticism even when you know it isn't "nice."

If you still held to your theory of criticism as initially stated, one might expect that you would have taken the opportunity to defend it in the course of the conversation. But you didn't. Your silence is eloquent on that score.

Your speech is more eloquent. You are not afraid to express your deep disagreement with principles and truths others hold dear. I thank you for your lack of fear, your willingness to tear down in order to build up.



Thanks for persevering. At this point, we don't have a mutually agreeable set of rules for engagement regarding our discourse. Until that happens, I don't see how we can begin to delve into these fabulous texts.



Hi Lamont,

Are you saying that you feel a need for a mutually agreeable set of rules of engagement in order to have a conversation about the Bible? What would those rules look like, from your point of view?



Not about the Bible per se-- about anything you and I chose to discuss.

I started musing about such rules of engagement, and it quickly took the form of a cross between a list of the things one wishes one's spouse would change, and a prescriptive list from Leviticus. And I just don't think such an approach would be good for our sense(s) of well being. So I'm going to let this go. We've been on a few dates, here, but we're just not good for each other.



That's fine, Lamont. I've enjoyed the conversations we've had. True, each time the conversation ended abruptly, with an exit on your part.

I'm convinced though that the subject matter is the problem. If we were talking about music, movies, or actresses, maybe even the Packers, conversation would be a piece of cake (as in Eddie Izzard's famous Cake or Death routine; I hope you've seen it).

You have been clear enough that the things God is in the Bible, things like judge and savior, undermine your sense of well being. The same is the case for a believer, as numerous passages in the Bible attest. Still, the tearing down is understood to be a part of a feedback loop that leads to a mature humanity, wiry and strong. I wish the same for you.


Ah, John--

You're like a scab I just can't keep from picking. My first wife was like that.

I'm not leaving abruptly. I've said fairwells quite politely, I think. That's an unfair assessment on your part.

But here's a thought-- you've judged me anti-theist. On the contrary; I'm not opposed to the reality of God. My suspicions are, there is one. What I am opposed to is the idea that the Jonah story's depiction of the nature of God is true. And I personally think that you agree with me; that the depiciton is not true. And yet you hold to it on this public forum. And that, my friend, makes you incredibly anti-theist.



Now we're cooking.

So here's my first question: what is the God whom you suspect exists like? If said God is unlike the God of Jonah and Jesus, who does he resemble?


Oh, no, no, no, no, John. Apologies first, sir, pillow talk later.

Why do you champion positions regarding God you know not to be true?



If you give an example of what you mean by a position regarding God I "know not to be true," we might make some progress.

You have proven unwilling to share your own positions regarding God, except to say that your understanding of God is at odds with that found in the Bible and, if I'm not mistaken, with God as presented in Jewish and in Christian tradition.

At some point, you will have to overcome your silence. A conversation, if it is going to authentic, has to be two-sided.


Hey John—

I’ve given this some serious thought over the weekend.

An exercise for each of us to do:

List out the ontological characteristics one believes to be true about the nature of God. As best as one is able, list where in one’s experience each belief came from.

Then within the context of the Hebrew and Christian texts, list out the characteristics that the authors believe to be true about the nature of God. And list the passages that support this belief.

Then we have a clear set of beliefs about the nature of God to have a 'compare and contrast' discussion from (or ‘from which to have a discussion’).

But I don’t think you’ll do it. I’m guessing you see no value in such an exercise, and frankly don’t trust me enough to humor me by doing so, reveal it, and then talk about the inconsistencies and incongruencies. And that’s fine.

I spent a bit of time looking back over your conversations with people who ‘showed you their cards.’ And I’m not willing to have you treat the revelation of ‘my cards’ the same way. So I don’t really trust you, either.

That said, I’m saddened by an unfulfilled fantasy I have that you and I could be having some really interesting discussions, but because we don’t really trust each other enough, those discussions won’t happen. Each of us would have to cross at least one personal Rubicon to reach a more mutually trusting connection, and I for one am not willing to do so.

It’s been interesting.

All the best—



Hi Lamont,

You like to linger in the doorway, don't you?

Your discomfort at the idea that *your* positions, not just those of the Bible, need to be open to discussion, is palpable. Are you that certain that they won't stand up to critical scrutiny? My guess: they probably have some merit. Given your coyness, you can be sure that I would begin with an appreciation of your critique before I critiqued your critique in turn.

I would be happy to make lists and offer proof texts. But I refer you to the questions I raised on this thread, in particular: are you willing to allow your own beliefs, not just mine, be open to discussion? If you are not, I don't see the point. I am making a reasonable request.

It is open-ended dialogue that I'm looking for on these threads; not hit-and-run commenters, or people who find it difficult to trust others and themselves in a vulnerable exchange.

Your willingness to critique the Bible is refreshing; your unwillingness to trust others and yourself in a forum of multi-directional cross-examination is disappointing.

Should you find the courage of your ideas such that you are willing to present them and open them up for discussion, you are always welcome on these threads. Until then, as we say among believers, godspeed.

True Grit 4

This is a good post. I feel like kindness is something that's necessary to show in our life, but I agree that it's often like giving someone a "free pass". This past school year, I dealt with this very issue. I had a roommate which I didn't like, but was still kind to him because that's what I felt was right to do. He, however, took my acts of kindness, like using my laptop to print papers and used them to take advantage of my kindness. A perfect example of a "free pass". I had to tell him to stop using my things, but was that really "kind"? In my eyes, it wasn't exactly, but I had blatantly been taken advantage of and I feel I had the right to end my kindness towards him. I think that's a big issue for Christians. Is it ever right to stop being kind? If it is, what is a good reason to stop? And is there ever really a person who can be "too nice"? I feel like I am "too nice" sometimes when it comes to people needing or asking things from me, but I don't know how or if I want to change that.

True Grit 2

I agree with True Grit 4 on the fact that it is hard not to be nice. I am a very happy person and I like to do all I can to make others happy, too. I am the doormat that gets stepped on, but I just keep shaking myself out and going right back to my place on the ground. It is very easy for nice people to be taken advantage of, because if I am not nice to someone I feel bad and give in to their way anyway. One example is that I am not a big drinker and I never have been, so when we go out I am the designated driver. I do not mind usually, however, it would be nice for someone else take the role, so that I can have a couple drinks. Many Christians are “nice” people because that is how we were raised. Some examples would be, open the door for someone, help them if they look like they need help, and give them a dollar if they are short at lunch time. The problem is we are nice to selfish people, which do not care if they do not return a favor when we need it. True Grit 4, you should not change who you are, but just change who you say yes too. If you know that they will not be there for you then saying “NO!” is the best answer. If you say no to that particular person a couple times they will know not to mess with you anymore and you will cease to be their person doormat.

Truman Show 2

I agree that a lot of people take advantage of other people’s kindness. There has been a lot of people in my life that have taken advantage of my kindness but I still would be kind to because I had been brought up that being kind to everyone was the right thing to do. The issue that I struggle with is still being kind to the people who do take advantage of me. I believe that I should still be kind to them even though they take advantage of me, so some times I stop being kind towards them. Doing this does not feel right to me but I also feel that you do need to do this sometimes to protect yourself from the people who are taking advantage of the people in the world who are kind to everyone.

Shawshank 4

I am not sure I can agree with there being such an apparent struggle between kindness and truth. What about “tough love”? I come from a family where “tough love” is the closest thing to true kindness. I personally believe that putting truth before consideration of whether or not someone’s feelings are going to be hurt is what kindness should be based on. In all actuality, if being tough on someone or hurting their feelings is going to benefit them in the long run isn’t that being kind? Thinking of someone’s long-term well being over their well being for a short period of time seems “kind” to me. Although I completely believe that it is valued in today’s society to be overly nice to advance socially; but aside from being well-liked where is that falsified niceness getting anyone? The focus has got to shift from saving someone’s feelings, to saying what needs to be said to help people become the best they can be. For example, my mother has been a stage mom her entire life; the kind that stands backstage taking notes on any rehearsal, audition, or performance I do. I would not work half as hard if every note she took said “Job well done, nothing to work on!” I value her “tough love” because it is honest. Even if the “truth” is something negative she can say it kindly and this is always something that has made me believe truth and kindness can be closely related.

Chariots of Fire 2

I think that any person can relate to the idea of being taken advantage of because of their kindness. Whether it is an accident or on purpose I’m sure that every one of us has once taken advantage of someone. We are all guilty of it. The title of this blog post has got me thinking about how it relates to the story of Jonah. God almost caused Jonah to commit suicide. Something so simple as kindness can be taken just out of proportion and can cause terrible things. As God tested Jonah, he nearly almost killed himself.

true grit 5

Kindness to the fullest should never be regretted. As a Christian kindness, even though can be taken advantage of at times, should still be a principal in our lives. I think of passage in Matthew 5, where Jesus is giving His Sermon on the Mount and He tells everyone if a man is to strike you on the cheek turn the other to him also, or if someone wants to sue you and take your tunics give him your cloaks as well. Basically kindness should not get the best of us to where we will get angry about it. If someone takes you headphones out of your kindness give them your ipod also. Don’t let your kindness drive you into anger. If kindness means going out of what you have to make sure others know that you love them then by all means do it. I go back to a speaker Mike Yankoski from last night who went homeless by choice with his friend. Out of kindness he wanted to share food with other homeless people. Knowing that he would still be hungry and maybe some may not be thankful of it, he still did it because it was better knowing someone would have a meal with them rather than both of them being full. To let your kindness towards others get walked over and irritate you is just letting Satan have a foothold and get the better of what Christ’s compassion and kindness was meant for.

Praying with Lior 3

Yes there are definitely times when our friends and loved ones need to have us be sympathetic, kind, and forgive them for their shortcomings, but I agree with Virginia Postrel’s thoughts of we really are doing nobody any favors by always being kind. I have often talked about this in my circles of friends and family. It is initially good to be kind when those we love fall on hard times, but I think we are cowards and enable these loved ones to continue in a downward spiral of pity if we do not be straight with them. How do we ever expect them to move on and learn to make something better of themselves if we caudle them and not make them take charge of their lives? Truth sometimes is a hard thing to hear but once we get over feeling bad for ourselves, we will hopefully be grateful for their honesty.

The Mission 2

Criticism is not the problem in this world; it’s the attitude of accepting criticism that’s the problem. Given the exception of a beat-down, boot camp criticism, constructive criticism can only benefit an individual. Criticism leads an individual to improve, to learn from mistakes, and to grow as a person. Can it hurt people’s feelings? Sure, but that’s up to the individual. My high school basketball coach would always tell his players that if he wasn’t yelling at you, he gave up on you. That being said, I took every shout, order, and critique to heart so I could improve as a player. I think this concept translates to real life too. People need to look past the shouting, and understand the true meaning behind the criticism. Every individual have people who want them to get better at a profession, at a sport, or as a human being; and if the critics stop, then we give up on becoming a better person.

Nell 2

Kindness is very important in a relationship, specifically a Christian one. I agree that one should not regret being kind. As the golden rule states, treat others as you would want to be treated. Even though kindness can surely be taken advantage of, I still believe it is important to be kind. It turns out that I am usually more kind to those that don’t deserve it or take advantage of it. I use the “kill them with kindness” approach. It is not worth getting angry over someone else who tries to take advantage of you being kind. Sometimes you may need to go out of your way to be kind. Some ways I like to show my kindness by giving back to the community and volunteering. Being kind makes me feel good about myself so it does not really get me angry if people try to take advantage of it. If it does start to bother me, I remember though Him I can do all things, and remain happy knowing that my kindness does not go unnoticed.

Chariots of Fire 1

While I agree that kindness can be misused, whether by the person being kind or the person receiving kindness, I don’t agree with the negative viewpoint of kindness shown in the first part of this blog. Part of kindness is sometimes giving a person a “free pass”. Sometimes people don’t deserve kindness, the same way they don’t always deserve forgiveness, but we should give it to them anyway. We are called to love and forgive them; kindness often goes hand in hand with that.

Truman Show 4

I'm not sure if I am on the same track you are with this topic, but I think I have an idea. Kindness is a very great and wonderful thing, but only at the right place and time. Sometimes stern retribution, or even showing someone you're mad at them is a much better way to solve things. I think of a parent raising a child; if the parent just coddles the child until that child is a young adult, that child will most likely become a spoiled person. It's times like that where kindness isn't always the best option, and to the people throughout the rest of life, not just only to children.

Breaker Morant 1

Kindness is good in certain terms, but on under occurring circumstances, it can also come back to haunt you. Too much kindness causes you to be vulnerable and accepting of someone else's hurt towards you. For example, a relationship; relationships can cause people to become accepting of the other persons actions due to the fact that they don't want to lose them, or be without them. Therefore, your accepting acts of kindness lead you to only hurt yourself, over and over again. Another way that kindness can hurt a person is like how Truman Show 4 explains. "I think of a parent raising a child; if the parent just coddles the child until that child is a young adult, that child will most likely become a spoiled person."

Kindness is not always a bad thing. It is good to be kind to everyone, we just have to know how and when to be kind so that it doesn't come back to haunt us like it may do in a relationship. Another thing that my parents always told me is to kill people with kindness. One example from my life would be dealing with the everyday occurrences of "drama" in high school. It should have just been considered a second language. Every time I was confronted face to face with this issue, I always put on a front and was kind to the instigator of this language.

Overall, I believe that kindness can be misused, but I also believe that there are many benefits to it as well. We just have to know when and where to use it.

Chariots of Fire 4

I completely agree with this statement, forgiveness can be dangerous in certain occasions. Not only can you give people a free pass to stomp all over you and continue to do it but you can also feed peoples addictions. For example when I went down to Texas to visit my aunt we gave a homeless person some money because he was begging for it, and latter that day we found him on the street tripping out on drugs. He took the money we gave him out of kindness and abused our kindness by buying drugs. So as you can see forgiveness can be dangerous and we have to make it clear when people do something wrong that it's not alright to do it again but we can still be kind and forgive them.

True Grit 12

I agree with this post, partially. Yes, it is doing someone a disservice to simply ignore the hurts that they cause and never criticize them. However, I also believe that the positive view of criticism has been taken too far to an extreme, at least in my experiences. I grew up in a very strict religion. We were taught exactly how the Bible is translated "correctly" and there was little to no wiggle room. Therefore, the criticisms that some people faced, I thought, were unjust. So, yes, criticism is not inherently a bad thing, but when used to an extreme, like I believe some religious people do, it can become not a tool for help, but something that pushes others away. And that pushing away is never helpful.

Dead Man Walking 2

I do believe kindness is a good thing, but to much kindness can be bad. Just like the saying goes, to much of a good thing can be bad. If you are kind to everyone, that is a good thing but there are people that are willing to take advantage of that kindness. They are able to exploit that kindness to get what they want. I believe that's what the beginning of the reading is saying, when you give someone a free pass, it can be dangerous. Criticism is a very rude way of kindness to me. Even though someone may be giving it with the best intentions, sometimes the truth really hurts. Even though you are trying to be nice and help someone out, sometimes it just hurts the person even more.

Praying with Lior 2

Kindness in today society is hard to find and give. Many times people will take advantage to those people who are extra kind. As a result many people are reluctant to show kindness because they are afraid of what may happen to them. It is really a shame that this is what the world has come to. I really like your statement, “damaging still, it [kindness] puts a damper on discovery and the search for truth.” Often people will sugar coat the truth in order to prevent from hurting someone and its horrible in my option.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Google Blogrolls

a community of bloggers

  • Abnormal Interests
    Intrepid forays into realia and texts of the Ancient Near East, by Duane Smith
  • After Existentialism, Light
    A thoughtful theology blog by Kevin Davis, an M. Div. student at University of North Carolina-Charlotte
  • AKMA's Random Thoughts
    by A. K. M. Adam, Lecturer in New Testament at the University of Glasgow
  • alternate readings
    C. Stirling Bartholomew's place
  • Ancient Hebrew Grammar
    informed comment by Robert Holmstedt, Associate Professor, Ancient Hebrew and Northwest Semitic Languages, Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, and John Cook, Associate Professor of Old Testament, Asbury Theological Seminary (Wilmore KY)
  • Antiquitopia
    one of the best blogs out there, by Jared Calaway, assistant professor in the Department of Religion at Illinois Wesleyan University.
  • Anumma - Hebrew Bible and Higher Education
    by G. Brooke Lester, Assistant Professor in Hebrew Bible, and Director for Emerging Pedagogies, at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary (Evanston IL)
  • Awilum
    Insightful commentary on the Bible and the Ancient Near East, by Charles Halton
  • AWOL - The Ancient World Online
    notice and comment on open access material relating to the ancient world, by Charles Jones of the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University
  • Balshanut
    top-notch Biblical Hebrew and Semitics blog by Peter Bekins, Ph. D. student, Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati OH, faculty member, Wright State University (archive)
  • Believing is Knowing
    Comments on things like prophecy, predestination, and reward and punishment from an orthodox Jewish perspective, by David Guttmann
  • Ben Byerly's Blog
    thoughts on the Bible, Africa, Kenya, aid, and social justice, by Ben Byerly, a PhD candidate at Africa International University (AIU), in Nairobi, Kenya working on “The Hopes of Israel and the Ends of Acts” (Luke’s narrative defense of Paul to Diaspora Judeans in Acts 16-20)
  • Berit Olam
    by a thoughtful Matt Morgan, Berkeley CA resident, grad student in Old Testament at Regent University, Vancouver BC (archive)
  • Better Bibles Blog
    Discussion of translation problems and review of English Bible translations by Wayne Leman, Iver Larsen, Mike Sangrey, and others
  • Bibbia Blog
    A Bible blog in Italian and English by former students of the PIB and PUG
  • Bible Background research and commentary
    by Craig Keener, professor of New Testament, Asbury Theological Seminary
  • Bible Design & Binding
    J. Mark Bertrand's place
  • BiblePlaces Blog
    a spotlight on the historical geography of the Holy Land, by Todd Bolen, formerly, Assistant Professor at the Israel Bible Extension campus of The Master's College, Santa Clarita CA
  • Biblicalia
    The riches of orthodoxy brought online by Kevin Edgecomb, a seminarian at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology (Brookline MA)
  • Biblische Ausbildung
    by Stephen L. Cook, professor of Old Testament / Hebrew Bible at Virginia Theological Seminary
  • C. Orthodoxy
    Christian, Contemporary, Conscientious… or Just Confused, by Ken Brown, a very thoughtful blog (archive). Ken is currently a Dr. Theol. student at Georg-August-Universität in Göttingen, part of The Sofja-Kovalevskaja Research Group studying early Jewish Monotheism. His dissertation will focus on the presentation of God in Job.
  • Catholic Bibles
    a thoughtful blog about Bible translations by Timothy, who has a degree in sacred theology from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome (Angelicum) and teaches theology in a Catholic high school in Michigan
  • Chrisendom
    irreverent blog with a focus on the New Testament, by Chris Tilling, New Testament Tutor for St Mellitus College and St Paul's Theological Centre, London
  • Claude Mariottini
    a perspective on the Old Testament and current events by a professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, Chicagoland, Illinois
  • Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot
    by Tyler Williams, a scholar of the Hebrew Bible and cognate literature, now Assistant Professor of Theology at The King's University College in Edmonton, Alberta (archive)
  • Colours of Scripture
    reflections on theology, philosophy, and literature, by Benjamin Smith, afflicted with scriptural synaesthesia, and located in London, England
  • Complegalitarian
    A team blog that discusses right ways and wrong ways Scripture might help in the social construction of gender (old archive only; more recent archive, unfortunately, no longer publicly available)
  • Connected Christianity
    a place to explore what it might be like if Christians finally got the head, heart, and hands of their faith re-connected (archive)
  • Conversational Theology
    Smart and delightful comment by Ros Clarke, a Ph.D. student at the University of the Highlands and Islands, at the (virtual) Highland Theological College (archive)
  • Daily Hebrew
    For students of biblical Hebrew and the ancient Near East, by Chip Hardy, a doctoral student at the University of Chicago
  • Daniel O. McClellan
    a fine blog by the same, who is pursuing a master of arts degree in biblical studies at Trinity Western University just outside of Vancouver, BC.
  • Davar Akher
    Looking for alternative explanations: comments on things Jewish and beyond, by Simon Holloway, a PhD student in Classical Hebrew and Biblical Studies at The University of Sydney, Australia
  • Deinde
    News and Discussion by Danny Zacharias
  • Discipulus scripturae
    Nathan Stitt's place
  • Dr. Claude Mariottini
    balanced comment by a professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary, Lombard IL
  • Dr. Platypus
    insightful comment by Darrell Pursiful, editor at Smyth & Helwys Publishing, on the New Testament faculty of Mercer University
  • Dust
    A diary of Bob MacDonald's journey through the Psalms and other holy places in the Hebrew Bible
  • Eclexia
    The heart and mind of this Bible and theology blogger sing in unison
  • Eat, Drink, and be Merry
    The journey of a grad student with a love for ancient languages at Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary (archive)
  • Elizaphanian
    Rev Sam tussles with God, and limps away
  • Emerging from Babel
    Stephen investigates the potential of narrative and rhetorical criticism as a tool for expounding scripture
  • Evangelical Textual Criticism
    A group blog on NT and OT text-critical matters
  • Evedyahu
    excellent comment by Cristian Rata, Lecturer in Old Testament of Torch Trinity Graduate School of Theology, Seoul, Korea
  • Exegetica Digita
    discussion of Logos high-end syntax and discourse tools – running searches, providing the downloads (search files) and talking about what can be done and why it might matter for exegesis, by Mike Heiser
  • Exegetisk Teologi
    careful exegetical comment by Stefan Green (in Swedish)
  • Exploring Our Matrix
    Insightful reflections by James McGrath, ass't. professor of religion, Butler University
  • Faith Matters
    Mark Alter's place
  • Ferrell's Travel Blog
    comments of biblical studies, archaeology, history, and photography by a tour guide of Bible lands and professor emeritus of the Biblical Studies department at Florida College, Temple Terrace (FL)
  • Fors Clavigera
    James K. A. Smith, professor of philosophy at Calvin College, thinks out loud.
  • Friar's Fires
    an insightful blog by a pastor with a background in journalism, one of three he pens
  • Gentle Wisdom
    A fearless take on issues roiling Christendom today, by Peter Kirk, a Bible translator
  • Giluy Milta B‘alma
    by Ezra Chwat and Avraham David of the Institute of Microfilmed Hebrew Manuscripts, Jewish National and Hebrew University Library, Jerusalem
  • He is Sufficient
    insightful comment on Bible translations, eschatology, and more, by Elshaddai Edwards
  • Higgaion
    by Chris Heard, Professor of Religion, Pepperdine University
  • Idle Musings of a Bookseller
    by James Spinti of Eisenbrauns
  • if i were a bell, i'd ring
    Tim Ricchiuiti’s place
  • Imaginary Grace
    Smooth, witty commentary by Angela Erisman (archive). Angela Erisman is a member of the theology faculty at Xavier University
  • James' Thoughts and Musings
    by James Pate, a doctoral student at HUC-JIR Cincinnati
  • Jewish Philosophy Place
    by Zachary (Zak) Braiterman, who teaches modern Jewish thought and philosophy in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University
  • kata ta biblia
    by Patrick George McCollough, M. Div. student, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena CA
  • Ketuvim
    Learned reflection from the keyboard of Jim Getz
  • Kilbabo
    Ben Johnson’s insightful blog
  • Kruse Kronicle - contemplating the intersection of work, the global economy, and Christian mission
    top quality content brought to readers by Michael W. Kruse
  • Larry Hurtado's blog
    emeritus professor of New Testament Language, Literature & Theology, University of Edinburgh
  • Law, Prophets, and Writings
    thoughtful blogging by William R. (Rusty) Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biblical and Theological Studies as College of the Ozarks and managing editor for Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament
  • Lingamish
    delightful fare by David Ker, Bible translator, who also lingalilngas.
  • Looney Fundamentalist
    a scientist who loves off-putting labels
  • Menachem Mendel
    A feisty blog on rabbinic literature and other Judaica by Michael Pitkowsky, Rabbinics Curriculum Coordinator at the Academy for Jewish Religion and adjunct instructor at Jewish Theological Seminary (New York)
  • mu-pàd-da
    scholarly blog by C. Jay Crisostomo, grad student in ANE studies at ?
  • Narrative and Ontology
    Astoundingly thoughtful comment from Phil Sumpter, a Ph.D. student in Bible, resident in Bonn, Germany
  • New Epistles
    by Kevin Sam, M. Div. student at the Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon SK
  • NT Weblog
    Mark Goodacre's blog, professor of New Testament, Duke University
  • Observatório Bíblico
    wide-ranging blog by Airton José da Silva, Professor de Bíblia Hebraica/Antigo Testamento na Faculdade de Teologia do CEARP de Ribeirão Preto, Brasile (in Portuguese)
  • Observatório Bíblico
    Blog sobre estudos acadêmicos da Bíblia, para Airton José da Silva, Professor de Bíblia Hebraica / Antigo Testamento na Faculdade de Teologia do CEARP de Ribeirão Preto, SP.
  • Occasional Publications
    excellent blogging by Daniel Driver, Brevard Childs' scholar extraordinaire
  • old testament passion
    Great stuff from Anthony Loke, a Methodist pastor and Old Testament lecturer in the Seminari Theoloji, Malaysia
  • Old Testament Pseudepigrapha Blog
    A weblog created for a course on the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, by James Davila (archive)
  • On the Main Line
    Mississippi Fred MacDowell's musings on Hebraica and Judaica. With a name like that you can't go wrong.
  • p.ost an evangelical theology for the age to come
    seeking to retell the biblical story in the difficult transition from the centre to the margins following the collapse of Western Christendom, by Andrew Perriman, independent New Testament scholar, currently located in Dubai
  • PaleoJudaica
    by James Davila, professor of Early Jewish Studies at the University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland. Judaism and the Bible in the news; tidbits about ancient Judaism and its context
  • Pastoral Epistles
    by Rick Brannan and friends, a conceptually unique Bible blog
  • Pen and Parchment
    Michael Patton and company don't just think outside the box. They are tearing down its walls.
  • Pisteuomen
    by Michael Halcomb, pastor-scholar from the Bluegrass State
  • Pseudo-Polymath
    by Mark Olson, an Orthodox view on things
  • Purging my soul . . . one blog at a time
    great theoblog by Sam Nunnally
  • Qumranica
    weblog for a course on the Dead Sea Scrolls at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, taught by James R. Davila (archive)
  • Ralph the Sacred River
    by Edward Cook, a superb Aramaist
  • Random Bloggings
    by Calvin Park, M. Div. student at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, South Hamilton MA
  • Resident aliens
    reflections of one not at home in this world
  • Revelation is Real
    Strong-minded comment from Tony Siew, lecturer at Trinity Theological College, Singapore
  • Ricoblog
    by Rick Brannan, it's the baby pictures I like the most
  • Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth
    Nick Norelli's fabulous blog on Bible and theology
  • SansBlogue
    by Tim Bulkeley, lecturer in Old Testament, Carey Baptist College (New Zealand). His Hypertext Commentary on Amos is an interesting experiment
  • Ancient Near Eastern Languages
    texts and files to help people learn some ancient languages in self study, by Mike Heiser
  • Midrash, etc.
    A fine Hebrew-to-English blog on Midrash, by Carl Kinbar, Director of the New School for Jewish Studies and a facultm member at MJTI School of Jewish Studies.
  • Phil Lembo what I'm thinking
    a recovering lawyer, now in IT, with a passion for a faith worth living
  • Roses and Razorwire
    a top-notch Levantine archaeology blog, by Owen Chesnut, a doctoral student at Andrews University (MI)
  • Scripture & Theology
    a communal weblog dedicated to the intersection of biblical interpretation and the articulation of church doctrine, by Daniel Driver, Phil Sumpter, and others
  • Scripture Zealot
    by Jeff Contrast
  • Serving the Word
    incisive comment on the Hebrew Bible and related ancient matters, with special attention to problems of philology and linguistic anthropology, by Seth L. Sanders, Assistant Professor in the Religion Department of Trinity College, Hartford, CT
  • Singing in the Reign
    NT blog by Michael Barber (JP University) and Brad Pitre (Our Lady Holy Cross)
  • Stay Curious
    excellent comment on Hebrew Bible and Hebrew language topics, by Karyn Traphagen, graduate, Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia PA (archive)
  • Sufficiency
    A personal take on the faith delivered to the saints, by Bob MacDonald, whose parallel blog on the Psalms in Hebrew is a colorful and innovative experiment
  • The Sundry Times
    Gary Zimmerli's place, with comment on Bible translations and church renewal
  • Sunestauromai: living the crucified life
    by a scholar-pastor based in the Grand Canyon National Park
  • ta biblia
    blog dedicated to the New Testament and the history of Christian origins, by Giovanni Bazzana
  • Targuman
    by Christian Brady, targum specialist extraordinaire, and dean of Schreyer Honors College, Penn State University
  • Targuman
    on biblical and rabbinic literature, Christian theology, gadgetry, photography, and the odd comic, by Christian Brady, associate professor of ancient Hebrew and Jewish literature and dean of the Schreyer Honors College at Penn State
  • The Biblia Hebraica Blog
    a blog about Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, the history of the Ancient Near East and the classical world, Syro-Palestinian archaeology, early Judaism, early Christianity, New Testament interpretation, English Bible translations, biblical theology, religion and culture, philosophy, science fiction, and anything else relevant to the study of the Bible, by Douglas Magnum, PhD candidate, University of the Free State, South Africa
  • The Forbidden Gospels Blog
    by April DeConick, Professor of Biblical Studies, Rice University
  • The Naked Bible
    by Mike Heiser, academic editor at Logos Bible Software
  • The Reformed Reader
    by Andrew Compton, Ph.D. student in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures (focus on Hebrew and Semitic Languages) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
  • The Sacred Page
    a blog written by three Catholic Ph.D.s who are professors of Scripture and Theology: Michael Barber, Brant Pitre and John Bergsma
  • The Talmud Blog
    a group blog on Talmud News, Reviews, Culture, Currents, and Criticism
  • Theological German
    a site for reading and discussing theological German, by Mark Alter
  • theoutwardquest
    seeking spirituality as an outward, not an inward quest, by David Corder
  • This Lamp
    Incisive comment on Bible translations in the archives, by Rick Mansfield
  • Thoughts on Antiquity
    By Chris Weimer and friends, posts of interest on ancient Greek and Roman topics (archive). Chris is a graduate student at the City University of New York in Classics
  • Threads from Henry's Web
    Wide-ranging comment by Henry Neufeld, educator, publisher, and author
  • Tête-à-Tête-Tête
    smart commentary by "smijer," a Unitarian-Universalist
  • Undeception
    A great blog by Mike Douglas, a graduate student in biblical studies
  • What I Learned From Aristotle
    the Judaica posts are informative (archive)
  • Bouncing into Graceland
    a delightful blog on biblical and theological themes, by Esteban Vázquez (archive)
  • Weblog
    by Justin Anthony Knapp, a fearless Wikipedian (archive)
  • Writing in the Dust
    A collection of quotes by Wesley Hill, a doctoral student in New Testament studies at Durham University (UK), and a Christian who seeks the charism of chastity
  • גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁב
    by David Miller, Associate Professor of New Testament and Early Judaism, Briercrest College & Seminary, Caronport, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • ואל-תמכר
    Buy truth and do not sell: wisdom, instruction, and understanding - a blog by Mitchell Powell, student of life at the intersection of Christ, Christianity, and Christendom
  • משלי אדם
    exploring wisdom literature, religion, and other academic pursuits, by Adam Couturier, M.A. in Old Testament/Hebrew Bible (graduate of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary)

Viewing Documents

  • Adobe Acrobat Reader
    To view the documents on this blog you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have this, download it from the link above.
Blog powered by Typepad



  • Ancient Hebrew Poetry is a weblog of John F. Hobbins. Opinions expressed herein do not reflect those of his professional affiliations. Unless otherwise indicated, the contents of Ancient Hebrew Poetry, including all text, images, and other media, are original and licensed under a Creative Commons License.

    Creative Commons License

    Copyright © 2005 by John F Hobbins.