Of all the responses to Ken Brown’s challenge so far, I’ve found that of Jared Calaway the most interesting. A great first step in learning how to read the Bible involves learning how to read it, not merely as an aesthetic experience, but for the thing itself, the subject matter it deals with. The reading of other examples of literature in which form and function are perfectly fused are excellent training grounds for reading the Bible.
It takes a great teacher, I suppose, to make Shakespeare
come alive: I was fortunate to have one. From Shakespeare I learned that there are
really only two ways of looking at the structure of existence: as tragedy (King
Lear) or tragicomedy (The Tempest). The only way for life to be
comic and not merely tragic, is, according to The Tempest, through
forgiveness and reconciliation. Of course, this is the Jacob cycle in Genesis
writ large. From the point of view of macro-genre, the Bible, let it be said, is
a tragicomedy of the first order. Why, you may ask, is it important to learn to
read Shakespeare before learning to read the Bible? Because it takes blood,
sweat and tears for a 21st century reader to make sense out of
Shakespeare. Fast forward to the Bible. No one should expect to understand the fine
grain of the Bible without a still greater investment in energy. Objectively
speaking, the Bible’s cultural distance from us is five times greater.
Epic narrative and poetry are examples of
well-wrought urns in which form and function are perfectly fused. Is it any
wonder that a good half of the Hebrew Bible is either one or the other? For an
understanding of how the literary and the theological are intertwined, I think C.
S. Lewis’s Reflections on the Psalms is as good as it gets. An extra
plus: Lewis is a great prose stylist. In the aforementioned slender volume, his
prose is effortless. I know of only one prose stylist who is better: Aldo
Leopold, in A Sand County Almanac.
The pathos of God and the prophetic call are
central to a great swath of biblical literature. Abraham Joshua Heschel’s
The Prophets is the best introduction available on the topic of the
anger of God. And I cannot for the life of me think of a more provocative essay
on the prophetic call than a slender essay by Martin Buber entitled “Plato
and Isaiah” (in Israel and the World: Essays in a Time of Crisis). It
was an introductory lecture given at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in 1938.
The essay displays that perfect mastery of the history of philosophy which might
only come from a first-class education in Germany. Buber discusses doom, hope,
and failure against an ominous historical backdrop.
Finally, I think Emil Fackenheim is a
great example of a modern Jewish thinker who was a prophet to the Gentiles
(like Rosenzweig and Heschel). Have you read Fackenheim’s 15 pages entitled “New
Hearts and the Old Covenant: On Some Possibilities of a Fraternal
Jewish-Christian Reading of the Jewish Bible Today”? Once you do, you will
never read Jeremiah 31:15-17 or 31:31-34 in the same way again. The essay appeared
in the Lou H. Silberman Festschrift (1980); it is included in the
anthology entitled The Jewish Thought of Emil Fackenheim: A Reader.
Ken Brown is keeping a list of links of those
who have taken the challenge. From Calvin Park’s comment
thread, a fine list from Jill, whom I’m hoping will start her own blog:
Tod Linafelt (2000) Surviving Lamentations
(set the tone for the renewal of Lamentatons scholarship in this decade).
David Carr (2005) Writing on the Tablet of
the Heart (shifted the conversation in Pentatuachal criticism in terms of
orality/textuality)
William Schniedwind (2004) How the Bible
Became a Book (also related to textuality and composition issues and is
very readable)
Bernard Levinson (2008) Legal Revision and
Religious Renewal in Ancient Israel (this book will have an increased
impact on intertextuality - the best one on the subject since Sommer’s book on
Isaiah)
Jeremy Schipper (2006) Disability Studies
and the Hebrew Bible (set the tone for the other books on the growing
number disability books since then and even got Brueggemann’s attention on the
backcover)
Jacob Wright (2004) Rebuilding Identity (influenced the discussion of Ezra-Nehemiah, especially in terms of composition).
I tag Celucien Joseph at Christ My Righteousness, Cynthia Nielsen at Per Caritatem, Shane Lems and Andrew Compton at Reformed Reader, Tony Siew at Revelation is Real, Julia O’Brien at the same, Sam Norton at Elizaphanian, Anthony Loke at Old Testament Passion, Phil Sumpter at Narrative and Ontology, and Darrell Pursiful at Dr. Platypus.
Ok John. I now list mine.Thanks for inviting me.
I seriously need to read Abraham Joshua Heschel’s book" The Prophets." Sadly I purchased a copy eight years ago when I was working on my B.A. in theology but have never read it in full.
Posted by: Celucien Joseph | June 20, 2009 at 10:38 PM
Celucien,
Thanks for your list:
http://christmyrighteousness9587.wordpress.com/2009/06/20/five-books-that-have-shape-how-i-read-the-bible/
N. T. Wright, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Gerd Thiessen and Annette Merz, George Eldon Ladd, and John Piper: a fine mix of top notch authors.
Posted by: JohnFH | June 22, 2009 at 08:47 AM