I have a dream. It goes like this. The day is
coming when ancient Hebrew will be widely taught at the high school and college
levels in private and public institutions.
By ancient Hebrew, I mean the Hebrew of the
Bible, but also epigraphic Hebrew, the Hebrew of Ben Sira, the Dead Sea
Scrolls, the Talmud, and the piyyutim.
My focus is on seeing ancient Hebrew taught
at the high school level. It could also be taught far more widely at the
elementary, middle school, and college levels.
Ancient Hebrew is taught in orthodox Jewish
settings from elementary school age on. How well and to what effect will depend on all kinds of factors. Surely everyone could learn something from the accumulated experience of this tradition. But my point is another. Languages like Latin and Greek are sometimes
taught at the high school level in both public and private institutions. Wherever
there is a demand for it, ancient Hebrew could be taught in the same contexts.
Is there a demand? There would be if it sunk
in that learning Hebrew, the foundational language of the Bible and the Talmud,
is a cultural priority.
There are people everywhere, people for whom
the Jewish and/or Christian heritages are important, who are not completely
overwhelmed by cultural amnesia. Wherever people believe the form of access to
the texts of the Bible or the Bible and the Talmud is cognitive, social, and existential
all at the same time, a harvest of interest in learning the languages of the texts
is waiting to be reaped.
When I offered to teach ancient Hebrew to
high school freshmen this fall, seven students signed up. Given their
intellectual abilities and (still mostly inchoate) existential commitments, it
was a natural continuation of their 7th and 8th grade confirmation
class experience. Basically, every 9th grader within my immediate circle of influence with the aptitude for learning ancient Hebrew chose to take it. The dynamic of which I speak has potential analogues in a
variety of contexts. It could be the same for others upon conclusion of the bar
and bat mitzvah experience. Quite apart from religious or anti-religious
leanings, learning Hebrew might just be a geeky thing to do.
Why Christian schools – evangelical,
Lutheran, Christian Reformed, Methodist, Anglican, Catholic, and so on – do not
offer biblical Hebrew (and Greek and Latin) to high school freshmen and above
is absolutely beyond me. It would be a natural way to engage a segment of the
student body – for whom the experience would be a steppingstone to other
things, including ministerial vocations – in an intellectual adventure of the highest
order. One thing would lead to another. To do so might be part of a larger
endeavor to recover a level of intellectual intensity in contemporary Christian
culture that by and large is sorely lacking.
Many public schools offer a variety of elective courses, and/or allow students to take college courses off-campus for high school credit. Allowing students to take a course of ancient Hebrew that earns them AP credit is in principle no different than allowing them to take a calculus or English AP elective course. College-level on-site and distance learning courses, or a hybrid of the above, are offered more and more often in public high schools in the United States.
In my next post, I describe innovative ways of teaching ancient Hebrew.
More power to your dream John.
Posted by: Peter Nathan | October 22, 2007 at 07:56 AM
Thanks, Peter.
For a dream like this to become reality, it has to be championed by both individuals and institutions. As I approach institutions on the matter, I will inform readers of the results.
Posted by: JohnFH | October 22, 2007 at 09:09 AM
I understood Latin to be taught fairly widely in academic high schools in the US. Modern Hebrew is not quite as common, but in larger urban areas, it is usually an option. Note that the College Board gives college-bound students SAT Subject Exams in both Latin and modern Hebrew. (The "SAT Subject Exam" was previously known as "SAT II" and before that as "College Board Achievement Tests".)
While there is of course a difference between Modern Hebrew and the Biblical Hebrew, one who has a solid foundation in Modern Hebrew will likely be able to pick up the classical language without excessive difficulty.
High school Greek seems to have taken it the chin. (However, what a pity it would be if high schools taught Koine in favor of the classical Greek.) Other favorites such as Russian have also passed from the scene.
Posted by: Iyov | October 22, 2007 at 10:18 PM
This is what I'm into. I'm staying tuned!
The lady who teaches Hebrew at the university here is also a free-lance biblical Hebrew teacher in the Bonn area. She teaches in a number of Gymnasien ('Grammar Schools'), but I don't know what kind of demand she has.
Posted by: Phil Sumpter | October 23, 2007 at 02:56 AM
Abnormal Interests critiqued this post here, to which I responded by defining 'cultural priority' and the unique role of Hebrew in our Western heritage.
Posted by: Phil Sumpter | October 23, 2007 at 03:23 AM
Iyov,
thanks for your comments. I would like to see classical Hebrew, Greek, and Latin taught far more widely at the high school level than is now the case. Here I focus on Hebrew.
Phil,
I'll have to check out Duane's post. "Cultural priority" is going to seem like a loaded term to some. Perhaps it is. Perhaps it would take a culture war of sorts to see to it that a set of ancient languages were taught widely at the high school level.
Posted by: JohnFH | October 23, 2007 at 07:29 AM