Here
it is. It’s the first definition I’ve seen in a long time that doesn’t make me
uneasy in any way whatsoever. Westminster wants to be rid of this scholar? I
can only say: Westminster’s loss will be someone else’s gain.
« The Pitiable Atheism of Friedrich Nietzsche | Main | The Risks and Rewards of Simultaneous Translation: Psalm 3 as a Test Case »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454e67969e200e55365a9978834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Peter Enns’ Definition of Inerrancy:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Copyright © 2005 by John F Hobbins.
Amen.
Posted by: art | June 11, 2008 at 12:39 PM
Art,
it pains me deeply to see that you are now threatened with expulsion or suspension from WTS. Like many people, I'm sure, I'm confident just the same that you will land on your own feet no matter what happens at WTS.
As for WTS, how the current crisis is resolved will determine its course in the near term. I am torn by this fight. On the one hand, I respect any theological institution that sets boundaries rather than take a "go-with-the-flow" approach.
On the other hand, viewed from the outside, it seems that the line in the sand was drawn in a way that will damage the institution in the near and long terms.
Posted by: JohnFH | June 11, 2008 at 02:09 PM
WTS is now kicking out students, too? I'm just about ready to tear up my degree and mail it back to the president.
Posted by: Alan Lenzi | June 11, 2008 at 11:04 PM
Art: I'm sorry to hear the news too. Good luck with the application to Princeton.
Posted by: Iyov | June 11, 2008 at 11:57 PM