SEARCH THIS SITE

Bible Reference Index

Diglot Editions

Dunash ben Labrat

Ali Ahmad Said

Verbal System of Ancient Hebrew

The Bible as seen through the eyes of . . .

« A Truly Ecumenical Study Bible | Main | Why Hector Avalos is Full of It »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

ElShaddai Edwards

John - have you spent any time with the Oxford Study Bible (REB) or the older NEB Oxford Study Edition? The latter was the standard Bible text at my college and I briefly used the REB update. They're useful as an ecumenical alternative to all the NRSV-based editions.

ElShaddai

Iyov

I do not agree, I fear.

I do not think the the Jewish Study Bible or Catholic Study Bible are particularly partisan in their interpretation. Both are primarily "Historical-Critical" and not confessional in outook.

Neither do I think that the Bibles listed as tradition-neutral. The NISB, for example, takes a relatively liberal Christian outlook throughout, with plenty of pastoral and even confessional comment. Indeed, it is quite a misrepresentation of the NISB to call it primarily Historical-Critical.

There are also problems with a number of your entries. There was no 1997 edition of the HSB. There was a 1993 edition, but with the editors listed for the 1997 edition. You do not distinguish between the ranks of the editors although you do for the Jewish Study Bible. Furthermore, the 1993 edition was not published by HarperSanFrancisco (note spacing) but by HarperCollins (note spacing) in London (alternatively, New York.)

You fail to list the new (2007) "Augmented Third Edition" of the OAB. The 2001 edition was called the "Third Edition" not the "NRSV Edition." In particular, Metzger and Meeks also edited a NRSV edition (the "Second Edition.") You do not list their edition of the RSV (which is still in print) for some reason, although it enjoys greater popularity than their NRSV edition.

There are two commas before 2006 in the CSB. In the CSB, the title pages only lists two editors, while the facing page lists 14.

I apologize for nitpicking, but "Le bon Dieu est dans le détail." (Alternatively, "Der Teufel steckt im Detail.")

JohnFH

Elshaddai,

No, I am not familiar with the REB Study Bibles. I will add those in print to the list. REB is an excellent translation, and deserves to be better known.

Iyov,

as usual, your points are well taken. Your comment referring to the NISB as relatively liberal Christian in outlook throughout, with plenty of pastoral and even confessional comment, is delightful, and in essence uncomfortably true. I almost put in a similar description of NISB, but thought how paradoxical it might seem, given the high number of Catholics, evangelicals, and Jews among NISB's contributors.

In some ways, NISB is comparable to Etz Hayim and Plaut (first or second edition), which I regret not listing, despite their coverage of the Torah alone. As for more conservative Jewish products available, I don't know my way around the neighborhood very well, and furthermore, have not found the ones I've spent time with as helpful as I hoped.

If you choose to post on this topic, I will link to it. You are more up-to-date and better informed on the topic than I am. There is much yet to be said about confessional stance, cross-confessional appeal, and the use of historical-critical and other methods of reading scripture as evidenced in study Bibles on the market today.

As for your nitpicking, I appreciate it. I will work on getting the details right. I could not, however, find a NRSV study Bible edited by Metzger and Meeks, which you refer to as the "Second Edition."

I have an older NOAB, an older HarperCollins, an older Catholic Study Bible, the Oxford Jewish Study Bible, the NISB, and the Orthodox Study Bible (NT and Psalms) on my shelf, and I use them all with profit. Do I wish Catholic, Jewish, and evangelical scholars would bring out more of the riches of the interpretive heritages specific to their traditions when writing for a general audience? Absolutely. But to do this well is not easy.

The whole question of the dominance of the historical-critical method of reading scripture in inter-confessional settings needs to be understood in light of the larger Enlightenment paradigm, which allows and disallows authentic dialogue at the same time. As an evangelical, I am sometimes painfully aware of how much it disallows it. If I'm not mistaken, you will understand what I'm driving at.

Doug Chaplin

John, I note in th UK a considerable popularity for the NIV study bible. I would also add to your list the standard edition of the New Jerusalem Bible, which has copious notes and other material. I do, however, see many reasons to be cautious about the whole study Bible phenomenon

JohnFH

Doug,

Thanks for this. I've linked to your post and added the NJB study Bible and the NIV Study Bible.

Kevin P. Edgecomb

I have the second edition of the New Oxford Annotated Bible, NRSV, and want to say that I strongly prefer it to the third edition of the OAB, if only from the quality of bookmaking employed. The terser comments of the older OAB were, I thought, a strength, rather than the chatty comments of the third (which seemed to have been chasing after the notes of the HarperCollins Study Bible, which was ultimately a hit-or-miss affair). The caution and wisdom of the editors and annotators of the second edition seemed thrown to the wind. While the first and second editions explicitly placed themselves within that tradition following on the King James to Revised to Revised Standard Version, the third lost its moorings, or rather tossed them overboard. Likewise, the work of Metzger and others, translators/editors cum annotators, in the first and second is invaluable, and is not replaced in value by the selection of annotators in the third.

And need we specify that it's hardly to be expected that any Bible containing the New Testament should not be considered to be of interest to a Jewish audience? The hand-wringing displayed over what to call the New Testament (and Apocrypha, for that matter) in some of these volumes is ridiculous, when considering the mere presence of a New Testament is sufficient to mark such a volume as a Christian Bible. Sheesh.

JohnFH

Kevin,

Excellent points. The very best homiletic commentary ages well, but most seems trite before the ink dries.

Iyov

And need we specify that it's hardly to be expected that any Bible containing the New Testament should not be considered to be of interest to a Jewish audience? The hand-wringing displayed over what to call the New Testament (and Apocrypha, for that matter) in some of these volumes is ridiculous, when considering the mere presence of a New Testament is sufficient to mark such a volume as a Christian Bible.

I do not agree. First, I note the hand-wringing is usually over what to call the Hebrew Scriptures (the term New Testament seems fairly universally adopted -- although I think that Christian Scriptures is more accurate because a wide variety of Christians still regard the "Old Testament" as valid scripture.) Similarly the term "Apocrypha" is offensive to a variety of Catholics and Orthodox for the same reason that referring to the Gospels as "myth" would be offensive to many fundamentalist Christians. The plain meaning of "apocryphal" is "of doubtful authenticity." (It is not lost on me that you are Orthodox and a former Catholic, but your use of the term does not immunize the rest of us, for the same reason that the use of the term "Oriental" by some of East Asian descent does not authorize the rest of us to use that term.)

The NOAB has a significant presence as a secular study Bible -- it has a "college edition" and is often used as a textbook in secular universities. Arguably, a wide swathe of students -- not only Christians -- will study the Bible in these contexts.

Similarly, the New Testament is a document of significant interest to those studying Second Temple Judaism, and even for some studying Tannaic writings.

Furthermore, if the presence of the New Testament makes the NOAB a "Christian Bible", then doesn't the presence of the Apocryphal works make it a Catholic/Orthodox Bible, and thus justifies the Catholic/Orthodox "Deuterocanonical" terminology?

Iyov

I mistyped -- it was Murphy and Metzger who edited the Second Edition of the NOAB.

JohnFH

I want to emphasize a comment by Kevin, that the HarperCollins study Bibles are hit-and-miss affairs, but extend it to the other study Bibles as well.

I have the first edition of the HarperCollins Study Bible on my shelf. The quality of the comment on many books far outstrips that of the second NOAB, which I also have. Superior HCB offerings include, for literary sensitivity: Genesis (Joel Rosenberg) and Ruth (Adele Berlin); for theological sensitivity: Hosea (James Luther Mays) and Psalms (Patrick Miller); for text-critical expertise: 1 and 2 Samuel (P. Kyle McCarter); for comment from the most qualified person for the job: Leviticus (Jacob Milgrom); Isaiah (J.J.M. Roberts); Song of Solomon (Michael V. Fox); and 2 Esdras (Michael Stone).

voxstefani

John, I would caution you against the use of the "Orthodox Study Bible" as an authentic representative of the Orthodox approach to the Scriptures, not only because it contains quite a number of errors, but chiefly because it betrays throughout a lack of conformity to what in our circles is often called the "mind of the Church." This is only to be expected, given that the origins of the project lie with a group of Evangelicals who eventually became Orthodox, but that were not such during the preparation of this volume, and only newly Orthodox at its publication.

I encourage you to read in this regard the excellent (but searing) review of the OSB by Archimandrite Ephrem Lash of Manchester (the Orthodox brother of the notorious Nicholas Lash of Cambridge, and a philologist of note).

As for the rest, I note that I much prefer the second edition of the NOAB over the third, which I brought back to the bookstore short of a month after having bought it. I adore my copy of the REB Oxford Study Bible and would likely bring it as my sole Bible to a deserted island, but I do not generally admit this in public. Also, I have never understood everyone's apparent fawning over the HarperCollins Study Bible, which I hardly ever crack open―and then, it is generally for one of its fairer offerings, which you list above. I can understand, however, the appeal of something which says "Society of Biblical Literature" right on the dustcover, which is, I suspect, why I have one at all.

Also, note that the NIV Study Bible (which I find quite useful on occasion, but less so now than a few years ago) is also available in NASB and KJV editions.

Esteban

JohnFH

Esteban,

I didn't know that about the Orthodox Study Bible. That's important information.

I'll have to add the info you pass on about evangelical study Bibles. Half of the avid Bible readers in congregations I've served have the NIV Study Bible, but I confess I've never given it a close look.

Iyov

I am hardly in a position to defend the Orthodox Study Bible (which I do not think is a particularly scholarly Bible) but I must admit that Archimandrite Ephrem Lash's comments (which I have seen before) are so over-the-top and filled with inaccuracies as to render them useless.

Lash's sets a snide tone in his first paragraph: "It must be clearly stated from the outset that the whole feel of this volume is wrong. It feels far too much like a piece of evangelical propaganda decked out in the trappings of Orthodoxy, like an eighteenth century New England chapel or meeting house with a golden onion dome stuck over the pediment of the porch." I think this statement puts Lash's entire review into perspective.

Lash's 2nd through 6th paragraphs attack the NKJV translation. Well, I am in agreement there -- I do not like the NKJV translation either. However, let me ask: where is the great English Orthodox translation of Scripture? No less a personage than Bishop Tikhon recommends the KJV and the NKJV for use. I would ask Lash: short of a completely new translation, which translation would you have preferred to have the OSBNTP use? Lash also attacks use of red letter in the Bible -- this is a common failing of Bibles -- but it hardly seems worthy of his outburst.

In his 7th paragraph, Lash attacks the OSBNTP for its color maps. Certainly, an astute reader such as Lash could hardly have failed to note the Thomas Nelson 1983 copyright notice on each of the maps. Now certainly, it would have been better to have used maps from an Orthodox atlas (does one exist?) but I suspect the Nelson maps were available for free. Moreover, the comment about the NT reading plans is just odd: the Orthodox reading plan is included since, there 10 page lectionary preceding the 3 page "bible reading plan."

In his 8th paragraph, Lash attacks the prayers, which he say contain "traditional material" for not mentioning Theotokos. I find it hard to believe that Lash actually read the prayers -- right there on p. 757 (fourth paragraph from the bottom) and p. 761 (top paragraph) is the prayer.

The 9th paragraph discusses Bishop Kallistos's contribution, so Lash must abate his criticism. Still, he needs to include the mandatory non-specific criticism, so he writes "It is a pity that the sort of approach recommended by the Bishop seems not to have been properly taken into account by the other contributors."

In the 10th paragraph, in commenting on the Lectionary, he begins by praising it, but then criticizes it: he objects to leaving out the eleven gospels (even though, as he notes, only Matins for major feasts are given -- is this so surprising in a brief lectionary?) Lash properly criticizes specific dates that show up in the Lectionary (an obvious editing error). The real source of his discomfort soon emerges: "The Lectionary is basically the Slav one." Now, I would suggest that the editors could have been more careful in identifying the lectionary, but I hardly think that choosing a particular denomination's lectionary calls into question the validity of the work.

In the 11th paragraph attacks the essay "Introducing the Orthodox Church." One might wonder at Lash's savage denunciation of this essay -- but a glance at the essay reveals the real problem is in the second sentence "Many people have heard of the Russian Orthodox Church ...." -- once again, the problem seems to be sectarian.

In the 12th paragraph, we are told that the glossary is flawed because it says "Abba" does not mean "Daddy." I'm sorry, but I can assure Lash that is exactly what it does mean! Lash grudgingly concedes that most of the entries are "well-done." Lash also liked the index (!!) but criticizes a listing of the Seventy for distinguishing two Marks -- if he looked more closely at the page, he would see that this was not implying two Marks at all but was merely the way the page was laid out.

In the 13th paragraph, Lash attacks an essay by one of the editors as being "rambling and incoherent" although surprisingly despite its incoherence it "makes a number of useful points." I'm wondering at this point who is more incoherent!

In the 14th paragraph, Lash attacks the table "Harmony of the Gospels" -- apparently Lash believes synoptic study is not worthy of Orthodox. He also criticizes the mini-NKJV concordance because it covers the whole Bible (!!!!) Does this seem to you like a guy with a chip on his shoulder? I mean -- really -- this is a concordance! If the Orthodox share a translation with their fellow Christians, must they produce their own concordances?

The 15th-18th paragraphs discuss the annotations. Lash contradicts himself repeatedly here: the notes are "helpful" and "dull." Lash argues that the notes are a low level and not very sophisticated, and I must agree with him -- but does that mean there is no beginner's Bible in Orthodoxy? Wouldn't a more advanced student be working in original languages, or referring directly to the work of the Fathers? The longer notes, we are told, are "extremely valuable" but Lash gets his knickers in a knot because of a note entitled "Mary" -- although the note itself refers to "Theotokos" and clearly asserts that is the proper name for the Orthodox to call Mary. For better or worse, "Mary" is the name used in the NKJV translation.

The 19th paragraph attacks the icons -- and why? Because they "stem from America."

I find myself wondering after Lash's last paragraph -- do Orthodox shun the newly converted? Is Lash correct that the only true Orthodox are those who have been Orthodox for centuries? The face of Orthodoxy put forward by Lash seems rather unwelcoming. Despite his attitude, I suppose I could have taken his arguments more seriously had Lash actually read this work seriously rather than making so many factually incorrect statements about the volume.

Kevin P. Edgecomb

Good points, Iyov. I wasn't clear. The NOAB is available in editions without the Apocrypha, a term I use for the simple reason that folks will know what I'm talking about. My own preferred terminology of "popular expansive Biblical literature" is not so catchy, and more work to type. I hadn't intended to pretend to be validating the use of the word "apocrypha" at all. If I were to be required to endorse a term, it would be αναγινωσκομενοι, 'readables', but that's simply outré.

Anyhow, one simply cannot buy a NOAB without a New Testament. How many Jews would even be interested in buying such a Bible? When I've talked with Jewish friends, their Bibles of choice (those used for classes aside) have never been Christian translations, but one of the JPS editions. I never even knew any to own the BHS! They prefer other rabbinically recommended editions, by Koren and such.

Also, you might not be aware that there are some nutjobs out there that discuss renaming the New Testament to Second Covenant or somesuch so as not to offend our Jewish friends. That's just silly, and that's what I was writing about. Unlike them, I'm not a person who thinks "old" is necessarily worse than "new." If anything, it's the contrary! But that's the tempest in a teacup that I was so sharp about. Sorry to have been unclear.

On Archimandrite Ephraim Lash's critique, I think he's most upset with the OSB volume (and remember, the origin of the review was an intra-Orthodox publication, so you're seeing some family bickering there) for its having not been the best presentation of Orthodoxy to the outside world. It's kind of namby-pamby, not really scholarly, and not sufficiently devotional particularly in a Patristic manner, which truly Orthodox commentary should be and usually is, except in the case of this Bible! It's frustrating that such a great opportunity was missed, is what I think he's trying to express, and I entirely, 1-zillion percent concur. Esteban was right to bring up the critiques, which I wasn't sufficiently comfortable with doing. It comes down to this: Is something better than nothing? Well, yes and no. So maybe. Or maybe not. So let's be grudgingly complimentary and pick on it, too! I think that's what's going on with that critique.

voxstefani

Iyov,

That Father Ephrem writes bombastically and with unabated flamboyance is undeniable, but I think you're getting bogged down in details and thus missing the forest for the trees.

The key to understanding Father Ephrem's protestations, I think, is his comment that he must again report on a missed opportunity. This Bible, with an impressive "overview committee" listed on the frontispiece (must of whom, however, never saw a page of the project and were unaware of belonging to any such committee), sets out to 1) embody the Orthodox Christian approach to the Scriptures and 2) be a suitable edition for personal and homiletical use by the Orthodox. It accomplished neither of these things. And the problem is precisely that it's a "piece of evangelical propaganda decked out in the trappings of Orthodoxy," however snide one might find such a comment and its accompanying illustrations. So you're quite right in noting that this comment sets the tone for the whole review, because it states the chief recurring theme of the whole piece: that at the root of all the problems of the OSB lies what we might call a "worldview deficiency."

Clearly Father Ephrem has a sketchy understanding of the politics of American Bible publishing, but I don't think his comments on the NKJV are therefore irrelevant or superfluous. His point that NKJV New Testament needs rather thorough correction before it can be called an "Orthodox New Testament" is quite correct, and since many folks (particularly Stateside) seem to consider that is so only because it's used in this Bible, this fact really does bear noting (and that repeatedly!). In any case, short of a complete translation, the least that should be done is to produce an Orthodox recension of a text such as the NKJV's, much like the Roman Catholics did in producing the RSV, Catholic Edition. Of course, it is unlikely that Nelson would have agreed to this, but this does not automatically remove the deficiencies of the NKJV for Orthodox use that Father Ephrem notes.

(Incidentally, I fail to see how Bishop Tikhon's pastoral judgment on this matter, which in any case was restricted to his own diocese while he was its ruling Bishop, could be weightier than Father Ephrem's, given that His Grace lacks the latter's training in Biblical philology. But the point is moot, given that Bishop Tikhon, a careful student of all matters linguistic, does not disagree with Father Ephrem at all: His Grace notes that neither the KJV nor the NKJV are "completely acceptable," and encourages that they be used only as a temporary solution to the problem of the lack of Orthodox translations into English.)

Speaking of Bishops, that Father Ephrem does not criticize Bishop Kallistos' piece has little to do with any perceived need to "abate his criticism" (on account of what?), but rather this is so because Bishop Kallistos' piece is truly a gem. And the "mandatory non-specific criticism" of which you speak, once again, draws our attention to the "worldview deficiencies" at the core of the OSB project, which as Father Ephrem wistfully notes, would have been significantly lessened if the principles articulated in Bishop Kallistos' piece would have been consistently heeded.

Your impression of the OSB's lectionary is mistaken in that this is indeed a full lectionary for every day of the year, but one clearly prepared without an adequate acquaintance with the interaction of the many cycles that converge in the cycle of ferial and festal readings €”the interactions of which are, as one might expect, both highly variable and minutely prescribed. (This, again, is not surprising given the lack of liturgical experience of the project team at the time of preparation.) From this vantage point, it is indeed surprising that the 11 Matins Gospels, which are read without fail in unbroken succession throughout the year, are nowhere given. What you call an "obvious editing error" is really not such at all, but rather betrays the actual source of this lectionary: not the service and rubrics books, but rather an annual calendar for a given year (probably the popular "St Herman Calendar," which is of Russian provenance) whose readings were reprinted wholesale into this lectionary without taking into account the general variables given in the rubrics. I fail to see how pointing this out is "sectarian" in nature.

That the second sentence of the article "Introducing the Orthodox Church" says that many people have heard of the Russian Orthodox Church is an unlikely cause for Father Ephrem's criticism. After all, the remainder of that very sentence reads "or the Greek Orthodox Church," to which Father Ephrem belongs, "which was born centuries earlier." And in any case, the team that produced the OSB belongs neither to the Russian or Greek Churches, but rather to the Church of Antioch! Thus, it is very hard for me to make any sense at all of these cries of sectarian prejudice (particularly when Father Ephrem wishes, towards the end of the article, that the ROCOR [Russian Orthodox Church Abroad] should have had a role in the publication of this volume, so as to lessen its "worldview deficiencies"!). A glance to anything further than the first part of the second sentence of this article, however, will put in evidence what Father Ephrem's real objections are, some of which he himself summarizes in his review. This summary may be found immediately following the sentence where he describes this piece as "tendentious and wholly unnecessary," €”namely, after the first sentence.

There are a couple things that make me think you're looking at a different printing of the OSB than that which Father Ephrem is reviewing. In my copy of the OSB, which is indeed the first printing, there are no mentions whatever to the Mother of God or the saints in the morning and evening prayers. Further, in the list of the Seventy Apostles, there are indeed two Marks listed, one after the other, with different feast days given. Again, this must be different from the printing you have, for not even the pagination that you give coincides with that of the book in front of me.

The comment about the iconography stemming from America might seem petty to those without, but it is really not such at all. There most certainly is within what I call "militant Americanist Orthodoxy" a culture of ugly iconography, which is perfectly illustrated by the dreadful icon of the Harrowing of Hell in the OSB. This is hardly the place to address the theology of the icon, but suffice it to say that the bastardization of iconographic aesthetics is theologically problematic on many levels, €”all the more so when this happens because Kentigernmungo Jones, a master of the Etch-A-Sketch, is now Orthodox and fancies himself an iconographer.

Father Ephrem is rightly troubled that, in an Orthodox Bible, the Mother of God is simply referred to as "Mary." The reason for this is that, as Kevin Edgecomb has brilliantly noted elsewhere, the regula fidei "is truly an entire complicated mindset involving behavior, action, belief, vocabulary, and writings." And so we return again to "the main point of what we have been saying": that this volume has serious "worldview deficiencies" and that it embodies hardly at all an Orthodox approach to the Scriptures, simply because time and again it finds itself at variance with the comprehensive regula fidei €”again, what in our circles is often called "the mind of the Church."

The last paragraph at which you wonder articulates more fully this latter point. The acquisition of this mind, of this complex and comprehensive regula fidei, simply does not happen overnight: it is a lifelong process. And it does indeed take centuries to acquire in corporate contexts (but not of course for individuals, though this process is greatly helped if it occurs in a corporate context thoroughly integrated to the mind of the Church). That this should seem unwelcoming comes as no surprise, and yet, all are welcome to join in the unbroken stream of the Tradition to be shaped and claimed by it, €”though of course, not all are willing to €˜leave all things and follow€™ where our Fathers have lead.€ This is the whole point. A book such as this, which is €œthe product of people who, with the very best of intentions, are going too fast too soon, is symptomatic of a much greater ailment, and Father Ephrem'€™s review is as much a critique of, and a searing corrective to, the volume in question as of the context which produced it.

Thus I must again caution against anyone referencing the Orthodox Study Bible as an authentic witness to the Orthodox Christian approach to the Scriptures, because this decidedly it is not.

Esteban

Kevin P. Edgecomb

Very well said, Esteban!

voxstefani

Thanks, Kevin! At least I now know that I'm not totally off base. ;-)

We must have been writing at the same time, because I missed your comment. Clearly I am in agreement with you, particularly with your observation that it is "not sufficiently devotional particularly in a Patristic manner, which truly Orthodox commentary should be and usually is, except in the case of this Bible."

I apologize for the many stylistic infelicities and for the few typos in my comment. My dear Godson called as I was about to start proofreading, and I mistakenly hit post! Ah, well. :-)

JohnFH

Esteban,

I'll take a moment to weed out typos, as I always try to do as a favor (not always appreciated) to commenters.

Esteban and Kevin,

And how about the complete Orthodox study Bible in preparation? Any ideas about what we should expect?

Kevin P. Edgecomb

We can hope for better than in the first version, I would think, knowing that at least some of the criticism over the last decade must have hit home. I hope so, anyway. We'll just have to wait and see. It should be available in the spring of 2008.

JohnFH

The project's site suggests they are preparing a translation and notes to the Septuagint, not the MT. Goodbye, NKJV, if that is true. I'm hopeful.

voxstefani

The Orthodox Study Bible, Old Testament uses the NKJV as a "boilerplate" and changes it wherever it differs from the LXX. In this it hardly differs from the NETS, which does the very same thing with the NRSV. There is, however, one pivotal difference: the NETS seeks to reflect in English the "translation Greek" quality of the LXX, whereas the OSB-OT seeks to produce a standard literary translation.

(For the New Testament, it should be noted, no changes are projected, so that that text used will again be that of the NKJV.)

I have two main concerns about the OSB-OT project:

1) First, the matter of textual basis. In an earlier version of the lxx.org site it was stated that their base text of the Septuagint was Rahlf's. (No information was given concerning such important matters as which text would be followed for Esther, Judges, and the like.) Needless to say, Rahlf's (semi-)critical edition is not the canonical text of the Orthodox Church, which should be the basis of any Orthodox Bible. I reflected a bit on this matter in a recent post.

2) With the exception of a handful among them, the translators seem dangerously underqualified for the task of Biblical translation. As we know, the sophisticated philological, linguistic and exegetical skills that such work demands cannot acquired in "three years of Greek"!

Yet I remain hopeful that the OSB-OT will be an essentially correct (please, God!) of its chosen Greek text, and that its usefulness will outweigh any errors. As for the notes, I only hope they're not inane. You see, by setting the bar that low, I'm sure to be pleased with whatever they print! ;-)

Esteban

voxstefani

Oh, John, thank you for taking care of the typos! I posted a fully corrected version on my comments here.

JohnFH

Thanks, Esteban, for helpful comments as always.

Iyov

You folks will enjoy P. Thomas Soroka's comments to one of my posts.

JohnFH

Soroka's last comment in particular is important. Whatever flaws the OSBNTP has, it marks an advance over the status quo ante for many English-speaking Orthodox believers.

Mission Lawrence

One you haven't mentioned is the "NET Bible" (net.bible.org) with a huge number of textual notes. Often it unlocks the reason various translations differ. Available free online or in print and electronic versions.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo

Google Blogrolls

a community of bloggers

  • Abnormal Interests
    Intrepid forays into realia and texts of the Ancient Near East, by Duane Smith
  • After Existentialism, Light
    A thoughtful theology blog by Kevin Davis, an M. Div. student at University of North Carolina-Charlotte
  • AKMA's Random Thoughts
    by A. K. M. Adam, Lecturer in New Testament at the University of Glasgow
  • alternate readings
    C. Stirling Bartholomew's place
  • Ancient Hebrew Grammar
    informed comment by Robert Holmstedt, Associate Professor, Ancient Hebrew and Northwest Semitic Languages, Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, and John Cook, Associate Professor of Old Testament, Asbury Theological Seminary (Wilmore KY)
  • Antiquitopia
    one of the best blogs out there, by Jared Calaway, assistant professor in the Department of Religion at Illinois Wesleyan University.
  • Anumma - Hebrew Bible and Higher Education
    by G. Brooke Lester, Assistant Professor in Hebrew Bible, and Director for Emerging Pedagogies, at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary (Evanston IL)
  • Awilum
    Insightful commentary on the Bible and the Ancient Near East, by Charles Halton
  • AWOL - The Ancient World Online
    notice and comment on open access material relating to the ancient world, by Charles Jones of the Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University
  • Balshanut
    top-notch Biblical Hebrew and Semitics blog by Peter Bekins, Ph. D. student, Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati OH, faculty member, Wright State University (archive)
  • Believing is Knowing
    Comments on things like prophecy, predestination, and reward and punishment from an orthodox Jewish perspective, by David Guttmann
  • Ben Byerly's Blog
    thoughts on the Bible, Africa, Kenya, aid, and social justice, by Ben Byerly, a PhD candidate at Africa International University (AIU), in Nairobi, Kenya working on “The Hopes of Israel and the Ends of Acts” (Luke’s narrative defense of Paul to Diaspora Judeans in Acts 16-20)
  • Berit Olam
    by a thoughtful Matt Morgan, Berkeley CA resident, grad student in Old Testament at Regent University, Vancouver BC (archive)
  • Better Bibles Blog
    Discussion of translation problems and review of English Bible translations by Wayne Leman, Iver Larsen, Mike Sangrey, and others
  • Bibbia Blog
    A Bible blog in Italian and English by former students of the PIB and PUG
  • Bible Background research and commentary
    by Craig Keener, professor of New Testament, Asbury Theological Seminary
  • Bible Design & Binding
    J. Mark Bertrand's place
  • BiblePlaces Blog
    a spotlight on the historical geography of the Holy Land, by Todd Bolen, formerly, Assistant Professor at the Israel Bible Extension campus of The Master's College, Santa Clarita CA
  • Biblicalia
    The riches of orthodoxy brought online by Kevin Edgecomb, a seminarian at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of Theology (Brookline MA)
  • Biblische Ausbildung
    by Stephen L. Cook, professor of Old Testament / Hebrew Bible at Virginia Theological Seminary
  • C. Orthodoxy
    Christian, Contemporary, Conscientious… or Just Confused, by Ken Brown, a very thoughtful blog (archive). Ken is currently a Dr. Theol. student at Georg-August-Universität in Göttingen, part of The Sofja-Kovalevskaja Research Group studying early Jewish Monotheism. His dissertation will focus on the presentation of God in Job.
  • Catholic Bibles
    a thoughtful blog about Bible translations by Timothy, who has a degree in sacred theology from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome (Angelicum) and teaches theology in a Catholic high school in Michigan
  • Chrisendom
    irreverent blog with a focus on the New Testament, by Chris Tilling, New Testament Tutor for St Mellitus College and St Paul's Theological Centre, London
  • Claude Mariottini
    a perspective on the Old Testament and current events by a professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Theological Seminary, Chicagoland, Illinois
  • Codex: Biblical Studies Blogspot
    by Tyler Williams, a scholar of the Hebrew Bible and cognate literature, now Assistant Professor of Theology at The King's University College in Edmonton, Alberta (archive)
  • Colours of Scripture
    reflections on theology, philosophy, and literature, by Benjamin Smith, afflicted with scriptural synaesthesia, and located in London, England
  • Complegalitarian
    A team blog that discusses right ways and wrong ways Scripture might help in the social construction of gender (old archive only; more recent archive, unfortunately, no longer publicly available)
  • Connected Christianity
    a place to explore what it might be like if Christians finally got the head, heart, and hands of their faith re-connected (archive)
  • Conversational Theology
    Smart and delightful comment by Ros Clarke, a Ph.D. student at the University of the Highlands and Islands, at the (virtual) Highland Theological College (archive)
  • Daily Hebrew
    For students of biblical Hebrew and the ancient Near East, by Chip Hardy, a doctoral student at the University of Chicago
  • Daniel O. McClellan
    a fine blog by the same, who is pursuing a master of arts degree in biblical studies at Trinity Western University just outside of Vancouver, BC.
  • Davar Akher
    Looking for alternative explanations: comments on things Jewish and beyond, by Simon Holloway, a PhD student in Classical Hebrew and Biblical Studies at The University of Sydney, Australia
  • Deinde
    News and Discussion by Danny Zacharias
  • Discipulus scripturae
    Nathan Stitt's place
  • Dr. Claude Mariottini
    balanced comment by a professor of Old Testament at Northern Baptist Seminary, Lombard IL
  • Dr. Platypus
    insightful comment by Darrell Pursiful, editor at Smyth & Helwys Publishing, on the New Testament faculty of Mercer University
  • Dust
    A diary of Bob MacDonald's journey through the Psalms and other holy places in the Hebrew Bible
  • Eclexia
    The heart and mind of this Bible and theology blogger sing in unison
  • Eat, Drink, and be Merry
    The journey of a grad student with a love for ancient languages at Gordon Conwell Theological Seminary (archive)
  • Elizaphanian
    Rev Sam tussles with God, and limps away
  • Emerging from Babel
    Stephen investigates the potential of narrative and rhetorical criticism as a tool for expounding scripture
  • Evangelical Textual Criticism
    A group blog on NT and OT text-critical matters
  • Evedyahu
    excellent comment by Cristian Rata, Lecturer in Old Testament of Torch Trinity Graduate School of Theology, Seoul, Korea
  • Exegetica Digita
    discussion of Logos high-end syntax and discourse tools – running searches, providing the downloads (search files) and talking about what can be done and why it might matter for exegesis, by Mike Heiser
  • Exegetisk Teologi
    careful exegetical comment by Stefan Green (in Swedish)
  • Exploring Our Matrix
    Insightful reflections by James McGrath, ass't. professor of religion, Butler University
  • Faith Matters
    Mark Alter's place
  • Ferrell's Travel Blog
    comments of biblical studies, archaeology, history, and photography by a tour guide of Bible lands and professor emeritus of the Biblical Studies department at Florida College, Temple Terrace (FL)
  • Fors Clavigera
    James K. A. Smith, professor of philosophy at Calvin College, thinks out loud.
  • Friar's Fires
    an insightful blog by a pastor with a background in journalism, one of three he pens
  • Gentle Wisdom
    A fearless take on issues roiling Christendom today, by Peter Kirk, a Bible translator
  • Giluy Milta B‘alma
    by Ezra Chwat and Avraham David of the Institute of Microfilmed Hebrew Manuscripts, Jewish National and Hebrew University Library, Jerusalem
  • He is Sufficient
    insightful comment on Bible translations, eschatology, and more, by Elshaddai Edwards
  • Higgaion
    by Chris Heard, Professor of Religion, Pepperdine University
  • Idle Musings of a Bookseller
    by James Spinti of Eisenbrauns
  • if i were a bell, i'd ring
    Tim Ricchiuiti’s place
  • Imaginary Grace
    Smooth, witty commentary by Angela Erisman (archive). Angela Erisman is a member of the theology faculty at Xavier University
  • James' Thoughts and Musings
    by James Pate, a doctoral student at HUC-JIR Cincinnati
  • Jewish Philosophy Place
    by Zachary (Zak) Braiterman, who teaches modern Jewish thought and philosophy in the Department of Religion at Syracuse University
  • kata ta biblia
    by Patrick George McCollough, M. Div. student, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena CA
  • Ketuvim
    Learned reflection from the keyboard of Jim Getz
  • Kilbabo
    Ben Johnson’s insightful blog
  • Kruse Kronicle - contemplating the intersection of work, the global economy, and Christian mission
    top quality content brought to readers by Michael W. Kruse
  • Larry Hurtado's blog
    emeritus professor of New Testament Language, Literature & Theology, University of Edinburgh
  • Law, Prophets, and Writings
    thoughtful blogging by William R. (Rusty) Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biblical and Theological Studies as College of the Ozarks and managing editor for Journal for the Evangelical Study of the Old Testament
  • Lingamish
    delightful fare by David Ker, Bible translator, who also lingalilngas.
  • Looney Fundamentalist
    a scientist who loves off-putting labels
  • Menachem Mendel
    A feisty blog on rabbinic literature and other Judaica by Michael Pitkowsky, Rabbinics Curriculum Coordinator at the Academy for Jewish Religion and adjunct instructor at Jewish Theological Seminary (New York)
  • mu-pàd-da
    scholarly blog by C. Jay Crisostomo, grad student in ANE studies at ?
  • Narrative and Ontology
    Astoundingly thoughtful comment from Phil Sumpter, a Ph.D. student in Bible, resident in Bonn, Germany
  • New Epistles
    by Kevin Sam, M. Div. student at the Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon SK
  • NT Weblog
    Mark Goodacre's blog, professor of New Testament, Duke University
  • Observatório Bíblico
    wide-ranging blog by Airton José da Silva, Professor de Bíblia Hebraica/Antigo Testamento na Faculdade de Teologia do CEARP de Ribeirão Preto, Brasile (in Portuguese)
  • Observatório Bíblico
    Blog sobre estudos acadêmicos da Bíblia, para Airton José da Silva, Professor de Bíblia Hebraica / Antigo Testamento na Faculdade de Teologia do CEARP de Ribeirão Preto, SP.
  • Occasional Publications
    excellent blogging by Daniel Driver, Brevard Childs' scholar extraordinaire
  • old testament passion
    Great stuff from Anthony Loke, a Methodist pastor and Old Testament lecturer in the Seminari Theoloji, Malaysia
  • Old Testament Pseudepigrapha Blog
    A weblog created for a course on the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, by James Davila (archive)
  • On the Main Line
    Mississippi Fred MacDowell's musings on Hebraica and Judaica. With a name like that you can't go wrong.
  • p.ost an evangelical theology for the age to come
    seeking to retell the biblical story in the difficult transition from the centre to the margins following the collapse of Western Christendom, by Andrew Perriman, independent New Testament scholar, currently located in Dubai
  • PaleoJudaica
    by James Davila, professor of Early Jewish Studies at the University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland. Judaism and the Bible in the news; tidbits about ancient Judaism and its context
  • Pastoral Epistles
    by Rick Brannan and friends, a conceptually unique Bible blog
  • Pen and Parchment
    Michael Patton and company don't just think outside the box. They are tearing down its walls.
  • Pisteuomen
    by Michael Halcomb, pastor-scholar from the Bluegrass State
  • Pseudo-Polymath
    by Mark Olson, an Orthodox view on things
  • Purging my soul . . . one blog at a time
    great theoblog by Sam Nunnally
  • Qumranica
    weblog for a course on the Dead Sea Scrolls at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland, taught by James R. Davila (archive)
  • Ralph the Sacred River
    by Edward Cook, a superb Aramaist
  • Random Bloggings
    by Calvin Park, M. Div. student at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, South Hamilton MA
  • Resident aliens
    reflections of one not at home in this world
  • Revelation is Real
    Strong-minded comment from Tony Siew, lecturer at Trinity Theological College, Singapore
  • Ricoblog
    by Rick Brannan, it's the baby pictures I like the most
  • Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth
    Nick Norelli's fabulous blog on Bible and theology
  • SansBlogue
    by Tim Bulkeley, lecturer in Old Testament, Carey Baptist College (New Zealand). His Hypertext Commentary on Amos is an interesting experiment
  • Ancient Near Eastern Languages
    texts and files to help people learn some ancient languages in self study, by Mike Heiser
  • Midrash, etc.
    A fine Hebrew-to-English blog on Midrash, by Carl Kinbar, Director of the New School for Jewish Studies and a facultm member at MJTI School of Jewish Studies.
  • Phil Lembo what I'm thinking
    a recovering lawyer, now in IT, with a passion for a faith worth living
  • Roses and Razorwire
    a top-notch Levantine archaeology blog, by Owen Chesnut, a doctoral student at Andrews University (MI)
  • Scripture & Theology
    a communal weblog dedicated to the intersection of biblical interpretation and the articulation of church doctrine, by Daniel Driver, Phil Sumpter, and others
  • Scripture Zealot
    by Jeff Contrast
  • Serving the Word
    incisive comment on the Hebrew Bible and related ancient matters, with special attention to problems of philology and linguistic anthropology, by Seth L. Sanders, Assistant Professor in the Religion Department of Trinity College, Hartford, CT
  • Singing in the Reign
    NT blog by Michael Barber (JP University) and Brad Pitre (Our Lady Holy Cross)
  • Stay Curious
    excellent comment on Hebrew Bible and Hebrew language topics, by Karyn Traphagen, graduate, Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia PA (archive)
  • Sufficiency
    A personal take on the faith delivered to the saints, by Bob MacDonald, whose parallel blog on the Psalms in Hebrew is a colorful and innovative experiment
  • The Sundry Times
    Gary Zimmerli's place, with comment on Bible translations and church renewal
  • Sunestauromai: living the crucified life
    by a scholar-pastor based in the Grand Canyon National Park
  • ta biblia
    blog dedicated to the New Testament and the history of Christian origins, by Giovanni Bazzana
  • Targuman
    by Christian Brady, targum specialist extraordinaire, and dean of Schreyer Honors College, Penn State University
  • Targuman
    on biblical and rabbinic literature, Christian theology, gadgetry, photography, and the odd comic, by Christian Brady, associate professor of ancient Hebrew and Jewish literature and dean of the Schreyer Honors College at Penn State
  • The Biblia Hebraica Blog
    a blog about Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, the history of the Ancient Near East and the classical world, Syro-Palestinian archaeology, early Judaism, early Christianity, New Testament interpretation, English Bible translations, biblical theology, religion and culture, philosophy, science fiction, and anything else relevant to the study of the Bible, by Douglas Magnum, PhD candidate, University of the Free State, South Africa
  • The Forbidden Gospels Blog
    by April DeConick, Professor of Biblical Studies, Rice University
  • The Naked Bible
    by Mike Heiser, academic editor at Logos Bible Software
  • The Reformed Reader
    by Andrew Compton, Ph.D. student in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Cultures (focus on Hebrew and Semitic Languages) at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
  • The Sacred Page
    a blog written by three Catholic Ph.D.s who are professors of Scripture and Theology: Michael Barber, Brant Pitre and John Bergsma
  • The Talmud Blog
    a group blog on Talmud News, Reviews, Culture, Currents, and Criticism
  • Theological German
    a site for reading and discussing theological German, by Mark Alter
  • theoutwardquest
    seeking spirituality as an outward, not an inward quest, by David Corder
  • This Lamp
    Incisive comment on Bible translations in the archives, by Rick Mansfield
  • Thoughts on Antiquity
    By Chris Weimer and friends, posts of interest on ancient Greek and Roman topics (archive). Chris is a graduate student at the City University of New York in Classics
  • Threads from Henry's Web
    Wide-ranging comment by Henry Neufeld, educator, publisher, and author
  • Tête-à-Tête-Tête
    smart commentary by "smijer," a Unitarian-Universalist
  • Undeception
    A great blog by Mike Douglas, a graduate student in biblical studies
  • What I Learned From Aristotle
    the Judaica posts are informative (archive)
  • Bouncing into Graceland
    a delightful blog on biblical and theological themes, by Esteban Vázquez (archive)
  • Weblog
    by Justin Anthony Knapp, a fearless Wikipedian (archive)
  • Writing in the Dust
    A collection of quotes by Wesley Hill, a doctoral student in New Testament studies at Durham University (UK), and a Christian who seeks the charism of chastity
  • גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁב
    by David Miller, Associate Professor of New Testament and Early Judaism, Briercrest College & Seminary, Caronport, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • ואל-תמכר
    Buy truth and do not sell: wisdom, instruction, and understanding - a blog by Mitchell Powell, student of life at the intersection of Christ, Christianity, and Christendom
  • משלי אדם
    exploring wisdom literature, religion, and other academic pursuits, by Adam Couturier, M.A. in Old Testament/Hebrew Bible (graduate of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary)

Viewing Documents

  • Adobe Acrobat Reader
    To view the documents on this blog you will need Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have this, download it from the link above.
Blog powered by Typepad

Technorati

Terms


  • Ancient Hebrew Poetry is a weblog of John F. Hobbins. Opinions expressed herein do not reflect those of his professional affiliations. Unless otherwise indicated, the contents of Ancient Hebrew Poetry, including all text, images, and other media, are original and licensed under a Creative Commons License.

    Creative Commons License

    Copyright © 2005 by John F Hobbins.